As soon as the SK Broadband and Netflix have set the use of Netflix, the appeal of the end of the net, the new legal controversy is spreading fiercely.

The big framework logic is similar to the first time. However, Netflix has been attracting attention that “Bill and Keep. Mutual Unconsaline) ‘principle, and the SK Broadband is against a new rule called’ the right of a trader ‘.

In relation to these laws, the trial is expected to demonstrate a substantially legal confrontation while requiring a concrete argument as an answer.

The trial requested a separate answer to the Netflix data dedicated to the Netflix data, which has been established on both sides on the 17th of the 17th, and the actual cost burden, and a separate answer to the Actual Cost and the Principles of Bill &

■ Network costs disappeared with OCA

First, Netflix repeated the claim that the SK Broadband, which is the ISP, via its own CDN Open Connect (OCA), reduces costs. It is a claim that the cost of traffic costs are reduced through OCA installed in Tokyo and Hong Kong.

In addition, the SK Broadband has a relay-access cost that needs to take on its OCA, and has a claim that it is for Netflix and the benefits of each other, and for the benefits of the Bill & Region.

In 1 Simplicity, the net flices that have been embedded, respectively, each of which has been embedded, respectively,

The SK Broadband refused for this claim. First of all, it was clear that there is no cost reduction in OCA. Even if overseas OCA has a significant cost for operating management to domestic Internet subscribers, it is a significant cost of operating management, and even if OCA is installed in Korea, it is the cost of data transfer, IDC utility, electricity fee, and Netflix is ​​ignoring it.

Facebook, including Apple TV, and the case of Disney Plus, and I heard that it is paying for an emergency for a net use form similar to Netflix. In addition, the OCA, which has entered the aquarium and the CDN, was that Netflix said that there was a data transmission obligation to send themselves.

■ Mutual unconfiguration is an ISP transaction practice

The SK Broadband pointed out that Netflix is ​​the Internet principle, and Pil & Ant is the premise.

The method of settlement of the Bill Anchor is that it does not claim traffic settlement costs, such as transaction traffic ratios, and the like, and the transaction practice between the period carriers has no corresponding matters. Netflix means that depending on the telecommunications business law, which is clear that the CP certificate of CP is definitely, but it is aware of the concept of attracting the concept that does not meet the situation.

In addition, Bill Anches also emphasized that they are all the time of payment in network usage between ISPs.

■ “Network utilization consultation”

Netflix puts the SK Broadband and the cost settlement from the beginning. On the other hand, SK Broadband was strongly refuted that such an explicit implied agreement did not exist.

The SK Broadband has been constantly requiring cost for the reasons for the data transfer of Netflix, international traffic, network expansion, and server link capacity. It is an explanation that not an uninstalled agreement, but a consultation that has been deployed as a premise.

The SK Broadband took out the recent payment claims, followed by the Netflix, according to the return of unfair gains in Netflix. Depending on the commercial law, the merchant will be able to claim a considerable repair when the trader is actually conducting for others.

It is a periodic communication company that provides internet-only line service is that it is an act within the operating range according to the commercial law.


The trial also demanded that the only line that the SK Broadband was built is mechanically, and how it is physically used. The Netflix has omitted this part of this part. I decided to ask if I had a deal in another CP.

The next aristent date is May 18th.